Home Archive News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 15, Issue 1, 2025
Pages: -
Professional paper
Nonmetallic materials
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 4
PDF Downloads: 2
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Professional paper Nonmetallic materials

EVALUATION OF PROFEX SOFTWARE FOR PHASE ANALYSIS OF CEMENT, CLINKER, AND LIMESTONE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY WITH TOPAS

By
Marina Jovanović ,
Marina Jovanović
Contact Marina Jovanović

Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Adnan Mujkanovic ,
Adnan Mujkanovic

Faculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Nevzet Merdic ,
Nevzet Merdic

Heidelberg Materials Cement BiH , Kakanj , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Nedžad Haračić ,
Nedžad Haračić

Heidelberg Materials Cement BiH , Kakanj , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Vinko Baranašić
Vinko Baranašić

Faculty of mining, geology and petroleum engineering, University of Zagreb , Zagreb , Croatia

Abstract

X-ray diffraction is a crucial method for characterizing crystalline materials, widely employed in the analysis of both products and raw materials in the cement industry, including clinker, cement, and limestone. Quantitative phase analysis via X-ray diffraction necessitates sophisticated computational tools to accurately interpret diffraction patterns. While commercial software like Topas is renowned for its precision, its high cost can be unaffordable for many academic and small-scale laboratories. This study assesses the reliability of Profex, an open-source graphical user interface for the BGMN Rietveld refinement engine, by comparing its performance against Topas in analyzing clinker, cement, and limestone samples. Our comparative analysis focuses on the quantification of major and minor phases, as well as the weighted profile R-factor as a measure of fit quality. Results indicate that Profex provides comparable accuracy to Topas in quantifying major phases such as alite, belite, and calcite. However, discrepancies arise in the quantification of minor phases and in Rwp values, suggesting potential limitations in Profex's refinement algorithms and peak fitting procedures. Despite these differences, Profex demonstrates potential as a cost-effective alternative for quantitative phase analysis, though caution is advised when interpreting results.

Funding Statement

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina for Project "Calcined Clay Use in Cement and Concrete Production Aimed at Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions" (Grant No. 05-35-2116-1/22), which was essential to the successful completion of this research.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.