Home Archive News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 14, Issue 1, 2023
Pages: 349 - 355
Review paper
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 57
PDF Downloads: 28
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 01.05.2023. Review paper ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

THE ROLE OF WOOD-BASED PRODUCTS IN SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

By
Petar Ćurić ,
Petar Ćurić

Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb , Zagreb , Croatia

Jelena Obranković ,
Jelena Obranković

Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb , Zagreb , Croatia

Andreja Pirc-Barčić
Andreja Pirc-Barčić
Contact Andreja Pirc-Barčić

Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, University of Zagreb , Zagreb , Croatia

Abstract

Wood is renewable, recyclable, climate-friendly material, and presents an important segment in
achieving circular economy and sustainability concepts. To be able to link these two concepts,
production and consumption systems need to transform towards sustainability. Wood-based
products play a role in mitigating climate change by reducing carbon from the atmosphere. Their
special properties, such as carbon storage capacity, high recyclability, renewal of raw materials,
and a direct impact on the reduction of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, make them the best
product to combat climate change. This paper aims to present the role of the wood-based industry
and its products in achieving sustainable development goals.

References

1.
Agriculture, forestry and fishery statistics: 2020 edition.
2.
Salzman J, Bennett G, Carroll N, Goldstein A, Jenkins M. The Global Status and Trends of Payments for Ecosystem Services. Nat Sustain. 2018;1:136–44.
3.
Sustainable Wood for Sustainable World.
4.
Vlosky RP, Ozanne LK, Fontenot RJ. A conceptual model of US consumer willingness‐to‐pay for environmentally certified wood products. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 1999;16(2):122–40.
5.
Burnard MD, Kutnar A. Human stress responses in office-like environments with wood furniture. Building Research & Information. 2020;48(3):316–30.
6.
Mamić D, Domljan D. Design of Decorative Wooden Wall Panels from Sliced Pedunculate Slavonian Oak (Quercus robur L.) from Veneer Production Residue. Forests. 2023;14(2):414.
7.
Ramage MH, Burridge H, Busse-Wicher M, Fereday G, Reynolds T, Shah DU, et al. The wood from the trees: The use of timber in construction. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2017;68:333–59.
8.
Sandberg D. Additives in wood products—today and future development. Environmental impacts of traditional and innovative forest-based Bioproducts. 2016;105–72.
9.
Markström E, Kuzman MK, Bystedt A, Sandberg D, Fredriksson M. Swedish architect’s view of engineered wood products in buildings. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2018;181:33–41.
10.
Koszewska M, Militki J, Mizsey P, Benda-Prokeinova R. Comparative analysis of sustainable consumption and production in Visegrad region-conclusions for textile and clothing sector. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, IOP Publishing. 2017;254(20):202003.
11.
Kaputa V, Šupín M. Consumer preferences for furniture. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Scientific Conference – Wood Processing and Furniture Manufacturing. 2010. p. 81–90.
12.
Maťová H, Kaputa V. Green preferences of generation Y. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Scientific Conference – Globalization and its socio-economic consequences. 2017. p. 1510–7.
13.
Pirc A, Moro M, Ojurović R, Bublić A. Consumer decision – Croatian furniture: YES or NO? In: Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Ambienta. 2008. p. 39–44.
14.
Anderson RC, Hansen EN. The impact of environmental certification on preferences for wood furniture: A conjoint analysis approach. Forest Prod J. 2004;54(3):42–50.
15.
Xiaolei C, Jun S, Bing L. Customer preferences for kitchen cabinets in China Using conjoint analysis. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research. 2014;6(2):14–22.
16.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)UNECE/FAO. Forest Products Annual Market Review. 2021;1–100.
17.
Wood T, Chitra K. In search of the green consumers: A perceptual study. Journal of Services Research. 2007;1:173–91.
18.
Zinkhan GM, Carlson L. Green advertising and the reluctant consumer. Journal of advertising. 1995;24(2):1–6.
19.
Shrivastava P, Hart S. Creating sustainable corporations. Business strategy and the environment. 1995;4(3):154–65.
20.
Brundtland GH. Our common future—Call for action. Environmental conservation. 1987;14(4):291–4.
21.
Maximo YI, Hassegawa M, Verkerk PJ, Missio AL. Forest bioeconomy in Brazil: potential innovative products from the forest sector. Land. 2022;11(8):1297.
22.
Hurmekoski E, Jonsson R, Korhonen J, Jänis J, Mäkinen M, Leskinen P, et al. Diversification of the Forest Industries: Role of New Wood-Based Products. Can J For Res. 2018;48:1417–32.
23.
Hassegawa M, Karlberg A, Hertzberg M, Verkerk PJ. Innovative forest products in the circular bioeconomy. Open Research Europe. 2022;2:19.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.