Home Archive News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 13, Issue 1, 2021
Pages: 88 - 97
Research article
Metallic materials
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 41
PDF Downloads: 22
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Published: 28.05.2021. Research article Metallic materials

DETERMINATION OF THE REPRESENTATIVE VOLUME ELEMENT OF DUAL-PHASE STEELS BY 3D TOMOGRAPHY

By
Emina Vardo ,
Emina Vardo
Contact Emina Vardo

University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Aida Imamović ,
Aida Imamović

University of Zenica , Zenica , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Jessica Gola
Jessica Gola

AG der Dillinger Hüttenwerke, Germany Germany

Abstract

Dual phase steels are low carbon steels which are thermo-mechanically processed to getting better formability and toughness than ferrite-perlite steels with similar tensile strength. The microstructure of these steels consisting of a ferrite matrix with hard martensitic/ bainitic second phase. The concept of representative volume element (RVE) is critical to understand and predict the behavior of effective parameters of steels. The RVE is considered to be a partial volume of the material, which is statistically homogeneous from the macroscopic point of view. In this paper determination of the representative volume of two dual phase steels (one with a martensitic and the second with a bainitic) is presented. Multiple samples are excised from the total volume of tomography and different parameters are observed to get the smallest RVE with stabile parameters. Results show that size of reduced volume has an influence on the parameterstability, while position of the observed reduced volume has not. 

References

1.
Al-Abbasi FM, A J. Nemes“Characterizing DP-steels using micromechanical modeling of cells. Computational Materials Science. 2007;39:402–15.
2.
Katani S, Ziaei-Rad S, Nouri N, Saeidi N, Kadkhodapour J, Torabian N, et al. Schmauder“Microstructure Modelling of Dual-Phase Steel Using SEM Micrographs and Voronoi Polycrystal Models. Metallogr Microstruct Anal. 2013;2:156–69.
3.
Tasan CC, Diehl M, Yan D, Bechtold M, Roters F, Schemmann L, et al. An Overview of Dual-Phase Steels: Advances in Microstructure-Oriented Processing and Micromechanically Guided Design. Annual Review of Material Research. 2014;45(1):391–431.
4.
P. Tsipouridis “Mechanical properties of Dual Phase steels“Doctoral dissertation, München.
5.
Ohser J, Mücklich F. Statistical Analysis of Microstructures in Materials Science. 2001;
6.
DeHoff RT. Quantitative serial sectioning analysis: preview “. Bd. 1983;131(September).
7.
Schröder J, K. Hackl“Plasticy and beyond. 2013.
8.
E.Vardo Jg, FMücklich. Comparison of different steel types by using 3D tomography”. In: 12 th Scientific/Research Symposium with International ParticipationMNM,B&H. 2018.
9.
Pabst W. E.Gregorová,“Characterization of particles and particle systems”, ITC Prague, FRVŠ 674 / 2007 F1 / b, Tvorba předmětu “Charakterizace částic a částicových soustav. 2007;
10.
AVelichko. Quantitative 3D Characterization of Graphite Morphologies in Cast Iron using FIB Microstructure Tomography”. doctoral thesis,Saarbrücken. 2008;
11.
Vecchio I. Image based characterization and geometric modeling of 3D materials microstructures”. 2014.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.