Home Archive News Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 15, Issue 1, 2025
Pages: -
Abstract
See full issue

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 3
PDF Downloads: 0
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Abstract

EXTRACTION OF NANOCELLULOSE FROM AGRICULTURAL WASTES

By
Ayşenaz Onar ,
Ayşenaz Onar

Yeditepe University , Istanbul , Turkey

Zahra R. Navazi ,
Zahra R. Navazi
Contact Zahra R. Navazi

Yeditepe University , Istanbul , Turkey

Nebahat Aral Yılmaz
Nebahat Aral Yılmaz

Yeditepe University , Istanbul , Turkey

Abstract

The most abundant renewable biomass on the earth is lignocellulosic biomass supplying from the forestry, forestry residue, and agricultural wastes nearly annually 200 billion tones worldwide. Agricultural wastes encompass a lot of cellulose, lignin and hemicellulose in composite form. Cellulose, the most important part of a plant structure, is a renewable, biocompatible, and non-toxic biopolymer possessing numerous hydroxyl functionalities. In plant’s structure hemicellulose and cellulose are held together by lignin in which lignin and hemicellulose act as an adhesive and a medium respectively. Utilization of cellulose in a high value-added way may open a new window in a bright future for biomass waste usage. Nanocellulose (NC) is a biopolymer possessing outstanding properties like remarkable mechanical strength, high aspect ratio, reactivity, lightweight, biocompatibility, high flexibility, biodegradability, and self-assembling capability. NC could be achieved from cellulose via chemical, mechanical and biological approaches.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.